 |
©Photo by Everett
Roseborough, Toronto
Simpson's 'Abstracts at Home' Exhibition,
1953
From left: Tom Hodgson, Oscar Cahén, Alexandra
Luke,
Kazuo Nakamura, Ray Mead, Jack Bush and
William Ronald
|
About
the Painters Eleven…
In 1953, a group of Canadian
painters adopted the name “Painters Eleven” and
launched Toronto’s answer to the New York school
of abstract expressionism. Toronto seemed the unlikeliest
place for such a movement as the city lay quietly
in a realm of church and Sunday prohibitions. Sidewalk
cafés were prohibited as was the sale of tobacco
on Sunday. The city was dull after dark and for
many it was an orderly, unexciting strict Toronto
life. A gloomy 1950 article in Canadian Art
concluded: “There is something rotten in the state
of Toronto art, and it is of the dead rot kind,”
where according to artist Graham Coughtry, “every
damn tree in the country has been painted.”
The group’s first collective
exhibition opened in February 1954 at Toronto’s
Roberts Gallery. While the Group of Seven possessed
a distinctive style, Painters Eleven never sought
aesthetic common ground beyond a commitment to modernism.
Stylistic differences
between each member of the group tended to be personal
rather than regional. In a group of great talent,
it was Oscar Cahén who stood out as exceptional,
and his loss in a car accident in 1956, was deeply
felt.
Painters Eleven sought
a united front against artistic traditionalism and
by their continual presence they changed Toronto’s
art scene, spoken of metaphorically in Canadian
Art as having undergone a “blood transfusion,”
with an unprecedented “quantity and variety of art.”
Some of the group went on to earn international
reputations. Painters Eleven led Toronto’s first
and last great abstract expressionist movement while
in New York the days of paint-splattered bohemians
were already passing. Many artists who followed
in the Painters Eleven footsteps were inspired by
their work, many rejected it outright, but one thing
remained certain, even though Painters Eleven voted
to disband in October 1960, according to influential
art critic Clement Greenberg, the group including
Oscar Cahén, had within themselves “the personal
abilities to say something as profound as anywhere
in the world.”
Adapted by Gerrit
Verstraete from an article by Graham Broad* “Painters
Eleven: The Shock of the New” in Canada’s History
Magazine, The Beaver, Vol 84:1, p.21 Feb/Mar
2004
*Graham Broad is an
art lover and a Ph.D candidate in history at the
University of Western Ontario. He is writing a study
of Canadian consumers in the Second World War and
is planning a book on Painters Eleven and the Toronto
art scene in the 1950s.
“From the perspective
provided by two decades, it seems clear that Painters
Eleven – its meetings, its exhibitions, its innovations
– constituted a decisive moment in the history of
modernist painting in Canada. During its lifetime
(1953-1960) it was described by Jock Macdonald,
a member, simply as the ‘abstract artist group of
Ontario’[1]. Critics and journalists of the period
described it as ‘experimental,’ progressive and
inevitably, controversial. To older artists in Toronto
like Paraskeva Clark who came from Europe and admired
the work of Cezanne and Picasso, Painters Eleven
looked like an adventure.
For its artist members,
Jack Bush (1909-71); Oscar Cahén (1916-56); Hortense
M. Gordon (1887-1961); Thomas Hodgson (b.1924);
Alexandra Luke (1901-1960); Ray Mead (1921-1998)
Jock Macdonald (1897-1960); William Ronald (1926-1998
); Harold Town (1924-1990); Kazuo Nakamura (1926
-2002); Walter Yarwood (1917-1996), Painters Eleven
was simply the world they lived in at the time “the
only answer” to the questions they were asking.
The group was important; its members liked the fact
that people saw “different ways and different things”,
that change was in the air”. One of the good qualities
in the group, its inner spark, was that the members
were amazingly united in purpose and held a common
faith in one another – a faith which was never explained
verbally to each other but which existed.”
“That Painters Eleven
existed at all doubtless developed the focus on
contemporary art in Toronto and perhaps even in
Canada. Bush felt that Painters Eleven was responsible
for the tearing down of parochial fences. This we
did not so much on purpose. but in instinctive desperation.
One of the most apt descriptions of Toronto at the
time, as I remember, was a backwater, and perhaps
we were lucky it was.”
The group was a league
for defense against the various artists’ societies
which then controlled the scene, primarily the Royal
Canadian Academy and the Ontario Society of Artists.
The Art Gallery of Toronto was, as Town recalls,
“afflicted with the presence of society exhibitions
which repeated themselves ad infinitum”. For Town
and the others, the jury system utilized by older
groups to determine what works got into which shows
was a matter of squalor and tyranny.
During the group’s
first meeting, Town, always gifted with words, devised
the group’s name. Eleven sounded better than a dozen;
the number had a quality of flair, of idiosyncracy.
Painters stressed the medium primarily used by the
artist, although there were also collages (sometimes
painted too), water colours, drawings and monotypes.
Town recounts that
their thesis was a simple one. We weren’t really
militant and we were terribly innocent. We never
expected to sell any pictures and we paid for those
exhibitions ourselves. We paid for the booze, the
folders, the transportation and insurance.
Cahén was of special
significance to the Eleven. Three years after his
death, a prominent gallery director was to write
that the artist’s spirit “still dominates and motivates
the group”. and that the derivative exercises of
more than one member reflected the dominant inspiration
of Cahén. In fact, Cahén’s role in the meetings
of the group does not seem a key one. Macdonald
wrote of Cahén “I always turned difficult decisions
about the programme of PXI actions toward Oscar’s
consideration. I could always get a sane and sound
opinion from him no matter how diverse the discussions
were.
“Cahén’s influence
was greatest on Hodgson, who felt that the senior
artist was by far the “giant” of the group besides
being the “best colourist anywhere.” Ronald was
proud, too, that he picked Cahén as one of the initial
seven artists. One critic wrote that in Cahen’s
lifetime, he probably had more public notice and
success on his home ground than any artist working
in Canada[2] Certainly all the group found him an
“impressive” painter with a particularly warm colour
range. His use of dyes on large sheets of paper
was a technique that had an influence on all the
group. “You could say a bit of Oscar would turn
up in all of us eventually,” as Mead puts it. [3]”
Extracted from Murray,
Joan. Painters Eleven in Retrospect. The
Robert McLaughlin Gallery, Oshawa, 1979.
[1] Autobiographical
Notes, McCord Museum archives, McGill University
Montreal. Probably accompanied a letter from Jock
Macdonald to Maxwell Bates 21 October 1956.
[2] Pearl McCarthy “New Setting for Contemporary
Art “The Globe and Mail (Toronto) November 2 1957
p15.
[3] Interview with Mead 4 September 1977
|